Volume 9, Issue 4 (10-2024)                   CJHR 2024, 9(4): 199-204 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Parnoon K, Massahi T, Almasi A, Jaafari J, Valikhani F, Sharafi K. The Need for Indoor Radon Prevention and Mitigation in Iran: A Health Policy Brief. CJHR 2024; 9 (4) :199-204
URL: http://cjhr.gums.ac.ir/article-1-388-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
2- Social Development & Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
3- Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Health and Environment Research Center, Faculty of Public Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
4- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Paramedical, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
5- Social Development & Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. , kio.sharafi@gmail.com
Full-Text [PDF 469 kb]   (302 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (604 Views)
Full-Text:   (235 Views)
Introduction 
Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that results from the decay of uranium and radium, found in almost all soils and rocks [1]. Due to its carcinogenic nature, measuring and monitoring indoor radon (IRD) is of utmost importance [2, 3]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radon as a group 1 human carcinogen [4]. In addition, both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have identified the radiation dose from inhaling radon and its progeny as the 2nd leading cause of lung cancer, after smoking [5, 6]. The most common cancer worldwide is lung cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Additionally, radon is responsible for 2% (21,000 deaths) of cancer in Europe [7]. It has been reported that for every 100 Bq/m³ increase in the long-term average radon concentration, the incidence of lung cancer increases by approximately 16% [7]. Recent reports have also linked natural background radon to a 20% increase in cases of childhood leukemia [8, 9]. The WHO and EPA have set maximum permissible levels of IRD at 100 Bq/m³ and 148 Bq/m³, respectively [10, 11]. Furthermore, the global average IRD is reported to be 40 Bq/m³ [12].
Public awareness of radon and its associated health risks in Iran is low. It is therefore essential that environmental and health authorities take the necessary measures to raise public awareness. In addition, construction project managers, builders and engineers do not pay enough attention to the methods to prevent and contain IRD. The main objective of this policy brief is to highlight the need to focus on the prevention and control of IRD.

Materials and Methods
To compile this policy brief, we 1st conducted a comprehensive search of reputable national and international databases, including Google Scholar, Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Magiran and Islamic World Science Citation (ISC). Relevant keywords such as “radon,” “indoor,” “Iran,” “radiation,” “exposure,” “concentration” and others were used in the search, and they were combined (and/or) to conduct an exhaustive literature search. This search focused on scientific reports and studies conducted in Iran over the past two decades. By analyzing the main results of these studies, we determined the overall concentration of IRD in the main regions of the country. Finally, we have provided key recommendations for preventing and reducing IRD, building on successful strategies implemented in other countries.

Results
Table 1 shows the results of several important studies related to the occurrences of IRD in Iran. Of course, the number of studies is larger than these cases, but here it is limited to the report of a few. The table includes the studied region and its geographical orientation, analysis method, building type, building floor, sample size and Mean±SD and range (Bq/m3).



Numerous studies in Iran have assessed IRD levels, with many reporting concentrations exceeding both the WHO acceptable level (WHO-AL) of 100 Bq/m³ [10] and the global average (GAV) of 40 Bq/m³ [12]. For example, a study conducted in Shiraz by Hadad et al. (2011) found that IRD concentrations exceeded the GAV in all floors of the buildings examined, with levels in the basement exceeding the WHO-AL [13]. Similarly, a study by Bouzarjomehri and Ehrampoosh (2008) in Yazd showed IRD concentrations in the basement of a residential building to be higher than both the WHO-AL and GAV [14]. Research by Askari et al. (2019) in Tehran (Kahrizak) [15] and Sohrabi and Solaymanian (1998) in Ramsar, Tehran, Babolsar and Gonabad also showed that the average IRD levels were significantly higher than the GAV and WHO-AL [16]. A study by Aadelikhah et al. (2021) in Mashhad showed IRD levels exceeding the WHO-AL [17], while Fahiminia et al. (2016) found basement IRD concentrations in Qom to be above both the WHO-AL and GAV [18]. Other studies in various regions of Iran, including Tehran [19], Isfahan [20], Aleshtar [21], Khorramabad [22] and Shiraz [23], have consistently reported higher than average IRD levels in basements and ground floors.

Discussion 
Results from studies conducted across Iran indicate that the average IRD concentration in most areas exceeds the GAV [10, 12-23] and even the WHO-AL in some regions. Given these findings, it is imperative to highlight the significant health risks that IRD poses to the Iranian population. To address this issue, it is important to raise awareness among the general public, health authorities, regulators and contractors of the health risks associated with IRD. This increased awareness may lead to a change in attitudes and ultimately lead to the adoption of preventive measures against IRD. Therefore, various educational methods should be used to improve public knowledge about IRD, an area that does not receive enough attention in Iran. Mass media, particularly television, can play an important role in raising public awareness and empowering individuals to take simple and practical measures to prevent radon from entering their homes or workplaces.
To prevent and reduce IRD, health and regulatory authorities should establish structural and technical protocols and criteria that contractors must follow when constructing residential and public buildings. In addition, it is important to plan regular IRD measurements, provide the necessary equipment and create conditions to identify high-risk areas at city, regional and national levels.
Methods for reducing radon in homes vary significantly in complexity, long-term effectiveness and cost. Which method is best depends on the specific characteristics of the home, the radon concentration, and the pathways through which radon enters the building. A combination of methods may be necessary to achieve optimal results, especially at high radon levels. Involving experts in the field is critical to creating a radon-safe environment [24-26]. However, homeowners can often take initial, cost-effective steps to reduce radon levels in their homes [25].
Studies on IRD in Iran have shown that radon concentrations are generally higher in basements and 1st floors than on upper floors [13, 14, 21, 27]. This is because these lower levels are closer to the ground where radon is created. Therefore, building occupants, contractors and health inspectors should pay particular attention to these areas and implement stricter radon reduction and prevention measures.
The most important measures to reduce radon include both minor (simple and quick) and major (basic) measures [25]. Some of the smaller things homeowners can do with minimal cost include sealing cracks and openings in the building. Cracks and gaps in the building structure can allow radon to penetrate, but these can be sealed with foam sealant. In addition, wall and floor joints can be made radon-resistant by sealing them with polyurethane [28]. Opening windows on lower floors allows for ventilation and helps remove radon from the indoor environment. Ventilation is a key element in reducing radon exposure. Opening windows on upper floors also contributes to air circulation and radon removal. Although mechanical ventilation systems can reduce IRD, they consume energy [29, 30]. Installing ceiling fans promotes air circulation and reduces IRD. Combining ceiling fans with positive ion generators can ionize radon gas, causing it to stick to walls or ceilings and prevent it from being inhaled. It is important to note that ventilation fans can create negative pressure inside the building, which can draw in radon. When using ventilation fans, it is important to open multiple windows to allow air circulation [31].
Other major radon reduction measures include: soil suction, creating positive pressure in the home, using a small sump pit under the building connected to a pipe and a low-power exhaust fan, painting walls with impermeable paint, using polyethylene plastic floor coverings, and passing incoming water through a filtration unit containing activated carbon granules [29, 30].

Conclusion
Based on the results of previous studies, it can be concluded that IRD levels of residential and non-residential buildings assessed in Iran are in most cases above the GAV and in some cases even above the acceptable level established by the WHO. Given these findings, it is imperative that Iran takes comprehensive measures to prevent and control IRD in existing and newly constructed buildings. The 1st step in this regard is to educate the public, health officials, municipal inspectors, engineers and contractors through various media (especially mass media such as television) about the health risks of radon and the need for preventive measures. In addition, as a next step, it is necessary for building users and developers of residential buildings and public places to take preventive measures to reduce IRD in accordance with acceptable guidelines.

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran (Code: IR.KUMS.REC.1402.279). 

Funding
This study was supported by the Research Council of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran (Grant No.: 4020754). 

Authors' contributions
Conceptualization and supervision: Kiomars Sharafi and Tooraj Massahi; Methodology: Kimya Parnoon, Tooraj Massahi, and Foad Valikhani; Data collection: Kimya Parnoon, and Jalil Jaafari; Data analysis: Kiomars Sharafi and Ali Almasi; Investigation and writing: All authors; Funding acquisition and resources: Kiomars Sharafi.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Research Council of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran for the supports.




References
  1. Petermann E, Bossew P. Mapping indoor radon hazard in Germany: The geogenic component. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 80:146601. [DOI: /10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146601]
  2. Rani S, Kansal S, Singla AK, Mehra R. Radiological risk assessment to the public due to the presence of radon in water of Barnala district, Punjab, India. Environ Geochem Health. 2021; 43(12):5011-24. [DOI:10.1007/s10653-021-01012-y] 
  3. Ansre CY, Miyittah MK, Andam AB, Dodor DE. Risk assessment of radon in the south dayi district of the Volta Region, Ghana. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2018; 11(1):10-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jrras.2017.10.002] 
  4. ICRP. Lung cancer risk from radon and progeny and statement on radon. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 2010. [DOI:10.1016/j.icrp.2011.08.011] 
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Handbook on indoor radon: A public health perspective. Geneva: WHO Press; 2009. [Link]
  6. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Radiation: Facts, risks and realities. Washington: EPA; 2012. [Link]
  7. Ngoc LT, Park D, Lee YC. Human health impacts of residential radon exposure: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 20(1):97. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph20010097] 
  8. Little MP, Wakeford R, Borrego D, French B, Zablotska LB, Adams MJ, et al. Leukaemia and myeloid malignancy among people exposed to low doses (<100 mSv) of ionising radiation during childhood: A pooled analysis of nine historical cohort studies. Lancet Haematol. 2018; 5(8):e346-58. [DOI:10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30092-9] 
  9. Laurent O, Ancelet S, Richardson DB, Hémon D, Ielsch G, Demoury C, et al. Potential impacts of radon, terrestrial gamma and cosmic rays on childhood leukemia in France: A quantitative risk assessment. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2013; 52:195-209. [DOI:10.1007/s00411-013-0464-y] 
  10. World Health Organization (WHO). Sets radon action level of 2.7-less lung cancer risk than EPA 4.0 [Internet]. 2009 [Updated 2009 september 22]. Available from: [Link]
  11. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Consumer’s guide to radon reduction. Washington: Environmental Protection Agency; 2010. [Link]
  12. United Nations. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York: United Nations; 2000. [Link]
  13. Hadad K, Hakimdavoud MR, Hashemi TM. Indoor radon survey in Shiraz-Iran using developed passive measurement method. Iran J Radiat Res. 2011; 9(3):175-82. [Link]
  14. Bouzarjomehri F, Ehrampoosh MH. Radon level in dwellings basement of Yazd-Iran. Iran J Radiat Res. 2008 6(3):141-4. [Link] 
  15. Askari M, Hassanvand MS, Naddafi K, Zarei A, Yousefi M, Alimohammadi M. Assessment of indoor radon concentration in residential homes and public places in south of Tehran, Iran. Environ Earth Sci. 2019; 78(317):1-0. [DOI:10.1007/s12665-019-8320-2] 
  16. Sohrabi M, Solaymanian AR. Indoor radon level measurements in some regions of Iran. International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part D. nuclear tracks and radiation measurements. 1988; 15(1-4):613-6. [DOI:10.1016/1359-0189(88)90212-9] 
  17. Adelikhah M, Shahrokhi A, Imani M, Chalupnik S, Kovács T. Radiological assessment of indoor radon and thoron concentrations and indoor radon map of dwellings in Mashhad, Iran. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(1):141. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph18010141] 
  18. Fahiminia M, Fouladi Fard R, Ardani R, Mohammadbeigi A, Naddafi K, Hassanvand MS. Indoor radon measurements in residential dwellings in Qom, Iran. Int J Radiat Res. 2016; 14(4):331. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.ijrr.14.4.331] 
  19. Verijkazemi K, Mansouri N, Moattar F, Khezri M. [Assessment of concentration and the annual effective dose of radon gas in Imam hospital indoor air (Persian)]. J Health Res Commun 2016; 2 (2):1-8. [Link]
  20. Mirbag A, Poursani AS. Indoor radon measurement in residential/commercial buildings in Isfahan city. J Air Pollut Health. 2018; 3(4):209-18. [DOI:10.18502/japh.v3i4.404] 
  21. Hassanvand H, Birjandi M, Amiri A, Hassanvand MS, Kamarehie B. Investigation of indoor radon concentration in dwellings of Aleshtar (western part of Iran) and estimation of the annual effective dose from exposure to radon. Int J Radiat Res. 2019; 17(4):659-66. [Link]
  22. Hassanvand H, Sadegh Hassanvand M, Birjandi M, Kamarehie B, Jafari A. Indoor radon measurement in dwellings of Khorramabad city, Iran. Iranian journal of medical physics. 2018; 15(1):19-27. [DOI:10.22038/ijmp.2017.24851.1252]
  23. Azhdarpoor A, Hoseini M, Shahsavani S, Shamsedini N, Gharehchahi E. Assessment of excess lifetime cancer risk and risk of lung cancer due to exposure to radon in a middle eastern city in Iran. Radiat Med Prot. 2021; 2(03):112-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.radmp.2021.07.002] 
  24. Altendorf D, Grünewald H, Liu TL, Dehnert J, Trabitzsch R, Weiß H. Decentralised ventilation efficiency for indoor radon reduction considering different environmental parameters. Isotopes Environ Health Stud. 2022; 58(2):195-213. [DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2022.2047960] [PMID]
  25. Burghele BD, Boto M, Beldean-Galea S, Cuco A, Catalina T, Dicu T, et al. Comprehensive survey on radon mitigation and indoor air quality in energy efficient buildings from Romania. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 751:141858. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141858] [PMID]
  26. Rydock JP, Næss-Rolstad A, Brunsell JT. Effectiveness of radon mitigation measures in 12 houses 10 years after implementation. Indoor Built Environ. 2002; 11(1):38-43. [DOI:10.1177/1420326X0201100105] 
  27. Hadad K, Doulatdar R, Mehdizadeh S. Indoor radon monitoring in Northern Iran using passive and active measurements. J Environ Radioact. 2007; 95(1):39-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.01.013] 
  28. Becker R, Haquin G, Kovler K. Air change rates and radon accumulation in rooms with various levels of window and door closure. J Build Phys. 2014; 38(3):234-61. [DOI:10.1177/1744259113506071] 
  29. Rahman NM, Tracy BL. Radon control systems in existing and new construction: A review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009; 135(4):243-55. [DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncp112] 
  30. Ennemoser O, Oberdorfer E, Brunner P, Schneider P, Purtscheller F, Stingl V, et al. Mitigation of indoor radon in an area with unusually high radon concentrations. Health physics. 1995; 69(2):227-3. [DOI:10.1097/00004032-199508000-00007] 
  31. Lowe SA, Pettenato R. Reduction of Indoor Radon by Air Cleaning-Case Study. J Environ Eng. 2000; 126(12):1125-30. [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:12(1125)] 
Article Type: Narrative Review | Subject: Environmental Health
Received: 2024/07/27 | Accepted: 2024/08/29 | Published: 2024/10/19

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Caspian Journal of Health Research

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb