1. Ronsmans C, de Brouwere V, Dubourg D, Dieltiens G. Measuring the need for life‐saving obstetric surgery in developing countries. BJOG. 2004;111(10):1027-1030. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00247.x. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00247.x]
2. Wax JR, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J. Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience. Birth. 2005;32(3):203-206. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x. [
DOI:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00370.x]
3. Zwelling E. The emergence of high-tech birthing. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(1):85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00211.x. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00211.x]
4. Declercq E, Barger M, Cabral HJ, Evans SR, Kotelchuck M, Simon C, et al. Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(3):669-677. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255668.20639.40. [
DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000255668.20639.40]
5. Miesnik SR, Reale BJ. A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007;36(6):605-615. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00196.x. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00196.x]
6. Weaver JJ, Statham H, Richards M. Are there "unnecessary" cesarean sections? Perceptions of women and obstetricians about cesarean sections for nonclinical indications. Birth. 2007;34(1):32-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00144.x. [
DOI:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00144.x]
7. Häger RM, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, Nilsen ST, Kolaas T, Øian P, et al. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(2):428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.037. [
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.037]
8. Biasucci G, Rubini M, Riboni S, Morelli L, Bessi E, Retetangos C. Type of delivery affects the bacterial community in the newborn gut. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(Suppl 1):13-15. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.01.004. [
DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.01.004]
9. Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Fierer N, et al. Delivery type shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):11971-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002601107. [
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1002601107]
10. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Type of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(3):439-442. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01150-9. [
DOI:10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01150-9]
11. Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF. Williams obstetrics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2005.
12. Scott JR, Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, Nygaard IE. Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
13. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. [
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343]
14. Rahnama P, Mohammadi K, Montazeri A. Salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women: A qualitative study from Iran. Reprod Health. 2016;13:7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0120-5. [
DOI:10.1186/s12978-016-0120-5]
15. Shariat M, Majlesi F, Azari S, Mahmoudi M. Evaluation of cesarean delivery and its determinants in maternity hospitals in Tehran [in Persian]. Payesh. 2002;1(3):5-10.
16. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
17. Ryding EL. Investigation of 33 women who demanded a cesarean section for personal reasons. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72(4):280-5. doi: 10.3109/00016349309068038. [
DOI:10.3109/00016349309068038]
18. Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. In: Corton MM, Leveno K, Bloom S, Hauth J, Rouse D, Spong C, eds. Williams obstetrics. 23rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2010:697-723.
19. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92750-3. [
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92750-3]
20. Ahmad-Nia S, Delavar B, Eini-Zinab H, Kazemipour S, Mehryar AH, Naghavi M. Caesarean section in the Islamic Republic of Iran: prevalence and some sociodemographic correlates. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15(6):1389-1398.
21. Amiri M, Raei M, chaman R, Rezaee N. Investigating some of the factors influencing choice of delivery type in women working in Shahroud University of Medical Sciences [in Persian]. Razi J Med Sci. 2013;20(106):1-9.
22. Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Rossen LM. Births: Provisional data for 2017. Available at: https://www-doh.state.nj.us/doh-shad/view/sharedstatic/Provisional2017Births. pdf. Updated May, 2018. Accessed December 12, 2018.
23. Edmonds JK, O'Hara M, Clarke SP, Shah NT. Variation in cesarean birth rates by labor and delivery nurses. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46(4):486-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.009. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jogn.2017.03.009]
24. Fabri RH, Murta EF. Socioeconomic factors and cesarean section rates. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;76(1):87-88. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00544-6. [
DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00544-6]
25. Maroufizadeh S, Bagheri Lankarani N, Almasi Hashiani A, Omani-Samani R, Amini P, Esmaeilzadeh AEsmaeilzadeh A, et al. Prevalence of cesarean section and its related factors among primiparas in Tehran Province, Iran, in 2015 [in Persian]. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2017;35(423):303-309.
26. Mendoza-Sassi RA, Cesar JA, da Silva PR, Denardin G, Rodrigues MM. Risk factors for cesarean section by category of health service. Rev Saúde Pública. 2010;44(1):80-89. doi: [
DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102010000100009]
27. Donati S, Grandolfo ME, Andreozzi S. Do Italian mothers prefer cesarean delivery? Birth. 2003;30(2):89-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00226.x. [
DOI:10.1046/j.1523-536X.2003.00226.x]
28. Ali Mohamadian M, Shariat M, Mahmoudi M, Ramazanzadeh F. The influence of maternal request on the elective cesarean section rate in maternity hospitals in Tehran, Iran [in Persian]. Payesh. 2003;2(2):133-139.
29. Signorelli C, Cattaruzza MS, Osborn JF. Risk factors for Caesarean section in Italy: results of amulticentre study. Public Health. 1995;109(3):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80052-6. [
DOI:10.1016/S0033-3506(05)80052-6]
30. Gomes UA, Silva AA, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA. Risk factors for the increasing caesarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978-1979 and 1994. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(4):687-694. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.4.687. [
DOI:10.1093/ije/28.4.687]
31. Kiani A, Heidari M, Rahnama P, Mohammaditabar S. Midwives' attitudes and related factors towards elective cesarean section [in Persian]. Payesh. 2014;13(3):331-338.
32. Anderson GM, Lomas J. Explaining variations in cesarean section rates: patients, facilities or policies? Can Med Assoc J. 1985;132(3):253-259.
33. Darsareh F, Aghamolaei T, Rajaei M, Madani A, Zare S. The differences between pregnant women who request elective caesarean and those who plan for vaginal birth based on Health Belief Typel. Women Birth. 2016;29(6):e126-e132. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.006. [
DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.006]
34. Faisal I, Matinnia N, Hejar AR, Khodakarami Z. Why do primigravidae request caesarean section in a normal pregnancy? A qualitative study in Iran. Midwifery. 2014;30(2):227-233. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.08.011. [
DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2013.08.011]